 |
Interests.
What are your (your client’s) real interests in this
negotiation/mediation? What are your real goals? What do you want to resolve
this lawsuit and change the relationship? Why is this important to you? How do
you measure success? What are your success criteria? Do we know which issues are
most important to us? Least important? Have we reconsidered our goals recently?
Are they current or out of date?
|
 |
The other parties. What are the other parties’ interests? How do they
see this negotiation? What is important to them? Why? How do they see us? How
can we change their misperceptions about us? Do they stereotype us? How can we
avoid that? What are our shared interests with them? |
 |
Relationships.
What is our present relationship with the other parties?
Why? What are the present conflicts between us? What caused them? What future
conflicts between us are likely? How will these conflicts be resolved? Is more
litigation likely? Are we in danger of a cycle of repeat litigation? How would
we prefer to see our relationships change? How could it change?
|
 |
Information.
What facts do we know? How certain are we of our facts? What
information are we missing? How can we get the information we need? What
assumptions are we making? Are these good assumptions? What future events could
change this situation?
|
 |
Decision-making.
What is our trial risk? Are we over-confident in our
chances at trial? If we lose at trial, what happens? If we win at trial, what
happens? What are the
challenges to predicting trial outcome? Are we reacting to the other party or making thoughtful decisions? Are
we pre-occupied with past events or positions? Are we merely justifying past
decisions, positions or statements?
|
 |
Settlement
errors. Which settlement errors is our party likely to
commit? How can we avoid or mitigate the effect? |
 |
What do I need to know from or about the other party? What could they
tell me to clear up ambiguity? What would I like to know from them? How can I
ask that to get the clearest response? Who are their negotiators? What drives
them? What could cause them to leave the negotiating table? How can I encourage
them to keep negotiating?
|
 |
Likely negotiation
topics. What issues will we need to discuss in this
negotiation/mediation? How important are these issues to me? To them?
|
 |
Analysis of issues needed for resolution. In a comprehensive
resolution, define a list of all topics that will need to be addressed?
What are the reasonable options for resolution of each topic? |
 |
Value,
BATNA, aspirations - our party. What "value" do I need from the
negotiations? What is my BATNA ("best alternative to a
negotiated agreement")? What is a reasonable value to which I
can aspire? At what point will I decide to leave the negotiations
because of low prospective value?
|
 |
Value,
BATNA, aspirations - the other party. What "value" do
they need from the
negotiations? What is my BATNA ("best alternative to a
negotiated agreement")? What is a reasonable value to which
they
can aspire? At what point will they decide to leave the negotiations
because of low prospective value? |
 |
The
internal mediation. Every treaty is really three treaties
(one across the table and one on each side of the table). We
need all three to be successful, so each party must ensure that it
is mediating internally its own disputes. |
 |
What are some options that could resolve these issues and conflicts? Can
we create some new options for resolution? How? What can I offer to the other
party to encourage settlement? What do I value more highly than they? What do
they value more highly than I? What tradeoffs are in my best interests? Are
there some creative approaches to solving this dispute?
|
 |
Secondary effects.
How does the resolution of this dispute affect other
matters and issues? Positive or negative?
|
 |
Negotiating roles. If on a team, have we assigned roles? Who will handle
what issue? Who is the best spokesperson on an issue? As between lawyers and
clients, who will be responsible for what parts of the mediation?
|